Legal Opinion

Pittman & Harrison Co. v. Shook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 24, 1920No. 9415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Haskell County Court; Jas. P. Eannard, Judge. Action by M. S. Shook against the Pit1> man & Harrison Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

Plaintiff, M. S. Shook, of Has-kell county, sued defendant, Pittman & Harrison Company, a corporation, domiciled at Sherman, Grayson county, Tex. Plaintiff alleged that on or about August 27, 1918, through his agent, he ordered from defendant 65 bushels of winter turf oats at $1.75 per bushel, that the defendant represented that the seed so sold were capable of withstanding a very severe winter, and that said oats would afford very good grazing and yield splendidly in a dry and severe winter. He further alleged that he planted the oats, and when they came up' they proved not to be winter turf…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Phillio v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Robinson & Martin v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cuero Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Feeders' Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Nevell v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Stone Ft. Natl. Bank v. ForbessTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Swift & Co. v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Rio Grande Valley Citrus Exchange v. Leche & Leche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Stone Fort National Bank v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hendrix v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API