Legal Opinion

Frost National Bank v. Nicholas & Barrera

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1976No. 909PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee, Nicholas and Barrera, a Professional Corporation, to recover a sum of money embezzled by a public accountant employed by appellee through use of a checking account at The Frost National Bank of San Antonio, appellant.

Appellee sought recovery both on a contractual theory and on a negligence theory:(1) that appellant breached the depository contract between it and appellee by failing to pay the amounts of checks drawn by appellee only to the named payee of such checks, and that as a matter of law a bank must pay a check only to the payee named…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Clark v. WaggonerTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. The Stone Ft. Natl. Bank v. ForbessTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Nat. Bank of Springfield v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ames v. Great Southern BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Joffe v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Schrader v. Artco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Charalambous v. Jean Lafitte Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API