Legal Opinion

Phillio v. Blythe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

The material facts are, that Phillio, the appellant, employed Blythe, the appellee, to build him a house, in precinct Ho. 2, in the county of Cherokee, in which precinct the said Phillio had his residence. The contract for building the house was made in precinct Ho. 1 of the said county, though there was a conflict of evidence, on that point. The house having been built, suit was brought before a magistrate in precinct Ho. 1, by the said Blythe, for the value of the work and labor done. It is unnecessary to recapitulate the pleadings to the jurisdiction of the magistrate; or…

2Cited by50 opinions

  1. The Stone Ft. Natl. Bank v. ForbessTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. KW Construction v. Stephens & Sons Concrete Contractors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Krchnak v. Fulton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API