County of San Diego v. Woodward
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Defendants John Woodward, Minntaholia Woodward and Woodward Sand Company (Woodward) appeal an order denying their motion for payment of eminent domain litigation expenses under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1250.410. We find substantial evidence supports the trial court’s determination the County of San Diego’s (County) offer was not unreasonable and Woodward’s demand was. Accordingly, we affirm.
I
In late 1981 County employees began negotiating with Woodward about a public bridge improvement proposed for land owned by Woodward.
In June 1982 the County gave Woodward a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Gardena v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. KrauseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Lake County Sanitation District v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- San Diego Metro. Transit Dev. Bd. v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Santa Clara Valley Water District v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.