Legal Opinion

Community Redevelopment Agency v. Krause

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1984No. G000086PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana (the City) appeals two orders following a condemnation judgment in an eminent domain action: (1) the award of litigation expenses to respondent Kathryn M. Krause (Krause), and (2) the denial of the City’s motion to tax costs.

The City filed a complaint in eminent domain to acquire a parking lot located in downtown Santa Ana for redevelopment purposes. The parking lot was owned by Krause; situated on it were two billboards leased to Pacific Outdoor Advertising.

Concurrently with the filing of its complaint, the City…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Lake County Sanitation District v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. First Christian ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Hadley v. KrepelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API