Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Kranz

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1977No. Civ. 48449PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, Acting P. J.

This is a proceeding in eminent domain brought by the County of Los Angeles to acquire for street improvements a one-third-acre parcel of unimproved Redondo Beach land. owned by Eileen Kranz and Thomas Kranz, executor of the estate of Frank Kranz. Landowners appeal the order after judgment denying their motion to include their litigation expenses, attorney’s and appraiser’s fees, in the award of costs.

Landowners’ litigation expenses are not compensable as a matter of constitutional right in eminent domain proceedings. (Community Redevelopment Agency v. Abrams…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Los Angeles v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Rullman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wallis v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. San Diego Metro. Transit Dev. Bd. v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. City of Gardena v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API