Legal Opinion
Santa Clara Valley Water District v. Gross
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1988No. H002633PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAUER, J.
In this condemnation action, the property owners, Robert Gross and Yolanda Gross (hereafter collectively Gross), appeal from a postjudgment order which had denied them litigation expenses on the ground that they had not complied with Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410. That statute provides that a property owner must file a final demand for compensation and the condemnor, here the Santa Clara Valley Water District (the Water District), must file a final offer, both at least 30 days prior to the trial date. Entitlement to litigation expenses is thereafter conditioned…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Filbin v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.