Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Yuki

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1995No. H011486PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

The State of California (the State), the plaintiff in this eminent domain action, paid the property owners a judgment of $1,970,076.60 following a jury trial which determined the question of just compensation for the taking of property. In a subsequent motion by the property owners to recover reasonable expenses of litigation, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410, 1 the court awarded an additional $1,452,846.25 in litigation expenses, including attorney fees in the amount of $1,303,714.30.

The State appeals from the order awarding litigation…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Dunk v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. PinedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API