Legal Opinion

Radich v. Kruly

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1964No. Civ. 27427, 27523PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, J.

Respondent sued his daughter for support and maintenance under Civil Code, section 206. 1 The trial court found that respondent is a poor person who is unable to maintain himself by work, who has no substantial assets, no income except $135 per month old age benefits “which were terminated when ... defendant [appellant] ... agreed to pay $150.00 per month for ... plaintiff until the trial of this action.” That appellant is able to support and maintain respondent; that respondent was without funds to prosecute the action; and that “ [t]he plaintiff, in the performance and non-performance of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Woolams v. WoolamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Duffy v. YordiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Britton v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Estate of BlancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Bryant v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Gluckman v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Health Maintenance Network v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API