Radich v. Kruly
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, J.
Respondent sued his daughter for support and maintenance under Civil Code, section 206. 1 The trial court found that respondent is a poor person who is unable to maintain himself by work, who has no substantial assets, no income except $135 per month old age benefits “which were terminated when ... defendant [appellant] ... agreed to pay $150.00 per month for ... plaintiff until the trial of this action.” That appellant is able to support and maintain respondent; that respondent was without funds to prosecute the action; and that “ [t]he plaintiff, in the performance and non-performance of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Woolams v. WoolamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Duffy v. YordiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Britton v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Estate of BlancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bryant v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gluckman v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Health Maintenance Network v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.