Legal Opinion

Woolams v. Woolams

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1952No. Civ. 15321PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff, a polio victim 36 years of age, in an action brought under section 206, Civil Code, recovered judgment against defendant, her father, for $250 per month support. Defendant appeals.

Question Presented

Did the trial court abuse its discretion?

Facts

Defendant at the time of trial in 1950 was 63 years old. Prior to 1941 when plaintiff’s mother divorced him, all three lived in affluence, defendant having an income of around $100,000 per year. October 7, 1939, plaintiff was stricken with poliomyelitis, and for approximately three years was confined to her bed. She is still crippled from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Anderson v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McConoughey v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pencovic v. PencovicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Levy v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Bratnober v. BratnoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API