Paxton v. Paxton
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco allowing money for support, counsel fees, and costs pendente lite. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
These four appeals arise out of two actions commenced in the superior court—one by John A. Paxton against his father, Blitz W. Paxton, and his mother, Bessie E. Paxton, for maintenance, under section 206 of the Civil Code, and the other a similar action brought by Roma Paxton against the same defendants, who were also her parents. In each of the cases the court made an order allowing small amounts of money for support, counsel fees, etc., pendente lite, and from each of these orders the defendant Blitz W. Paxton appeals. In each of said actions said defendant made a motion for a change of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Livingston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by42 opinions
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.