Legal Opinion
City of Norwich v. Norwich Fire Fighters
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 28, 1977PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This action arose from a complaint filed by the Norwich Fire Fighters, Local 892, International Association of Fire Fighters, hereinafter the union, with the state board of labor relations, hereinafter the board, on behalf of a retired Norwich fireman, Thomas LaRochelle. The complaint alleged that the city of Norwich, hereinafter the city, had committed a prohibited labor practice by unilaterally excluding accumulated sick leave pay from the compensation upon which LaRochelle’s pension benefits were computed. On July 11, 1974, after a hearing, the board decided that the city’s unilateral…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- West Hartford Education Assn., Inc. v. DeCourcySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cone Mills CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.