Legal Opinion
Obeda v. Board of Selectmen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
The defendant board of selectmen (hereinafter the board) has appealed the judgment of the court ordering the board to restore the plaintiff forthwith as a member of the Inland Wetlands Commission (hereinafter the commission) of the town of Brookfield. Because on the basis of the record the trial court’s decision was proper we affirm.
In January, 1978, the plaintiff was appointed by the board to a fonr-year term as a member of the commission. She subsequently was elected its presiding officer. In December, 1978, the board voted to suspend the plaintiff as a member of the commission denoting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Molino v. Board of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Riley v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- McNiff v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Raslavsky v. BonvouloirSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lee v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kaeser v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- LaPointe v. BOARD OF ED. OF WINCHESTERSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fromer v. Town Council of the Town of WindsorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.