Legal Opinion
Klug v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 12, 1989No. 7600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from a decision by the named defendant, the Torrington inland wet*714lands commission (commission). The dispositive issue is whether the plaintiffs appeal was governed by General Statutes § 22a-43, the appeal provision of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act (act); General Statutes §§ 22a-28 through 22a-45; or by General Statutes § 4-183, the appeal provision of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA). We hold that the appeal was governed by § 22a-43, and we find error.
The facts are undisputed. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Murphy v. Berlin Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- McCallum v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Kaeser v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Barberino v. Inland wetlands/wtrcrse., No. Cv 91 0318300-S (Dec. 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Constas v. Plan. Zon. Bd., Greenwich, No. Cv89-0104251 (Feb. 14, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.