Legal Opinion
Modern Art Printing Co. v. Skeels
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 1954No. Civ. 286PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This action brought by Modern Art Printing Company, a partnership composed of Joseph Bardash and Percy Rimes, against Arthur N. Skeels and Alice M. Skeels, individually and as co-partners doing business under the firm name of Art Roll Leaf Stamping Company, seeks to enjoin an alleged infringement of Patent No. 2,491,947 applied for on June 11, 1948 by Bardash and issued to Bardash (assignor to Modern Art) on December 20, 1949. Plaintiffs also seek an accounting of profits, treble damages, costs, counsel fees, and an order for the destruction of all infringing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sterling Varnish Co. v. Louis Allis Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1956
- Cold Metal Products Co. v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956