Sterling Varnish Co. v. Louis Allis Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
This is a patent action. Plaintiff alleges that defendant has infringed claims 2 and 7 of Letters Patent 2,417,538, hereinafter referred to as Letters Patent ’538, which is owned by the plaintiff. The relief prayed for is permanently to restrain defendant from further infringement, to recover damages, and for costs and reasonable attorney fees.
Defendant pleads that its operations do not fall within the claims of plaintiff’s patent, and alleges that Patent '538 is invalid for the following reasons: That it is double patenting; that it is indefinite; and that it is lacking…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & H. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. George A. Breon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Preformed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- In Re the Complaint of Builders Supply Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1968
- Sterling Varnish Company v. Louis Allis CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
- Langsett v. Marmet CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.