Smith v. L.M. Berry & Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING IN PART, SUSTAINING IN PART AND DEFERRING RULING IN PART ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #7); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEFER RULING WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ON ERISA CLAIM (DOC. # 24) SUSTAINED ON THE BASIS OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN
RICE, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court for resolution of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 7).
Although Defendant’s Motion refers to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, since the briefing of this Motion, Plaintiff has obtained leave of Court to file a Second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Merkel v. Scovill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borowski v. State Chemical Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Parrish v. HBO & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Carr v. French Oil Mill MacHinery Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
- VEBS, INC., a California Corporation v. LEON SIMONEAU, an individual, and DOES 1–10, inclusiveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Wowo v. ITS Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.