Legal Opinion
Parrish v. HBO & Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 11, 1999No. C-3-98-370PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS ONE AND TWO OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (DOC. # 3); PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL STATE LAW CLAIMS DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff James Parrish initiated the instant litigation on August 31, 1998 (Doc. #1). In his Complaint, he asserted four causes of action against Defendant HBO & Company (“HBOC”), to wit: 1) age discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) (Count One); 2) age discrimination, in violation of Chapter 4112 of the Ohio Revised Code (Count…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Centaur Classic Convertible Arbitrage Fund Ltd. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Choate v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Oleski v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Eric Drake v. Consumers County Mutual Insurance, and Travelers Indemnity Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.