Legal Opinion

Carr v. French Oil Mill MacHinery Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 2, 1989No. C-3-88-108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR ITS FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED, FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6), TO FOLLOW

RICE, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the Motion of Defendant French Oil Mill Ma chinery Company to Dismiss Plaintiffs age discrimination claims pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and for failure to state a claim on which relief…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Esparza v. Pierre FoodsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Pater v. Health Care and Retirement Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. Baker v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. Callan v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Topeka, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API