Legal Opinion
Frederickson v. Nye
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1924No. 18120PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.
Two questions are involved in a determination of this case: First: Was there such an election of remedial rights by the Nyes in filing and pressing the Seneca county case as prevents them from asserting their claims in equity in the Hancock county case? Second: If there was such an election, which controls as to the Morgans, does the same operate as to their grantee, Frederickson?
The petition filed in the instant case, in Han cock county, among other averments, pleads as follows:
“The legal title to which now stands in the name of the defendant, Elbin Morgan, but which in equity, in view of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,357 Bertha Arber and Ann Arber Broek, Cross-Appellees v. Essex Wire Corporation and Walter F. Probst, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- In Re Mann Farms, Inc., Debtor. Traders State Bank of Poplar v. Mann Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. Banner Buick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Holscher v. FerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.