Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2011No. 38491PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

John Doe appeals the magistrate court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to his three minor children. We affirm.

I

Factual and Procedural History

The magistrate court found that Appellant, John Doe (Father), neglected his children by (1) failing to provide them with proper parental care within the meaning of I.C. § 16-1602(25)(a), and (2) being unable to discharge his parenting responsibilities under I.C. § 16 — 1602(25)(b). The court found it to be in the children’s best interests to terminate his parental rights because, although there is a bond between Father and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Termination of the Parental Rights of Doe 2009-19Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State, Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API