Legal Opinion

State v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2007No. 34170PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Jane Doe appeals the magistrate court’s order terminating her parental rights to her four children. She contends that there was not substantial and competent evidence to support the magistrate’s finding of neglect. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL ; BACKGROUND

Jane Doe is the mother to four children. 1 On August 3, 2005, ruling from the bench, the magistrate court terminated her parental rights to these four children pursuant to I.C. § 16-2005(b). The court then issued written findings and conclusions. Doe appealed this decision to the district court, which affirmed the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Interest of BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Doe v. Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API