Legal Opinion

In Re Termination of the Parental Rights of Doe 2009-19

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2010No. 37707-2010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights due to the mother’s neglect and inability to discharge her parental responsibilities as a result of her addiction to methamphetamine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 14, 2008, the Kootenai County prosecutor filed a petition under the Child Protective Act, Idaho Code §§ 16-1601 to 16-1643, concerning the infant daughter (Child) of Jane Doe (Mother). Pursuant to Idaho Code § 16-1611(4), the prosecutor sought in the summons an order that Child be removed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogg v. WolskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Marcia T. Turner, L.L.C. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. KMST, LLC. v. County of AdaIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Department of Health and Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Child v. ClouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Steven J. Snider v. Ronald D. ArnoldIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Frontier Development Group, LLC v. CaravellaIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Jane Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API