Legal Opinion

State, Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2008No. 33731PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The magistrate court, Honorable Howard Smyser presiding, terminated Jane Doe’s parental rights in May 2006. The magistrate court found (1) that Jane Doe had neglected her children (C.H. and B.Y.) as defined in I.C. §§ 16-1602(25), -2002(3)(b) and (2) that termination of parental rights was in the best interest of the children. Jane Doe appealed the magistrate’s findings as not supported by clear and convincing evidence as required by I.C. § 16-2009, and the district court, Honorable G. Richard Bevan presiding, affirmed the magistrate decision.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nicholls v. BlaserIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Crum v. State Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Doe II v. Doe IIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API