Legal Opinion

Luebke v. Hawthorne

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while riding in an automobile driven by defendant Hawthorne, a real estate salesman, employed by the defendant Fred F. Sexton, who is engaged in business at Portland, Oregon, under the trade name of Fred F. Sexton Company. Defendants moved for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit and for a directed verdict. These motions were denied, with the privilege, pursuant to § 6-707, O. C. L. A., as amended by Chapter 149, Oregon Laws 1945, of moving for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in the event a verdict was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Melcher v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wagnon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Johnson v. KolovosOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Rosa v. Briggs & LaffertyOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API