Legal Opinion

Rosa v. Briggs & Lafferty

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligent operation of two motor vehicles, brought by Arthur Rosa, as plaintiff, against Herbert G. Briggs and J. O. Lafferty, as defendants. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict being returned in favor of the defendant Lafferty against the plaintiff. A verdict also was returned in favor of plaintiff against the defendant Briggs for the sum of $4,000. Judgments were entered accordingly. Defendant Briggs appeals.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error in this court is that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Willoughby v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David v. Longenecker v. General Motors Corporation, a Corporation, Sharon Longenecker v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Brand v. RorkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Cays v. McDANIELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Johnson v. KolovosOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fullerton v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API