Legal Opinion

Hasbrook v. Wingate

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1949No. 31637PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question here presented is whether, applying the provisions of Section 6308-6, General Code, popularly known as the guest statute, the plaintiff was a guest of the defendant, transported without payment therefor; or a passenger of the defendant, paying for such transportation. Unless, under the statute, the plaintiff stood in the latter category, she was not entitled to recover. The text of the statute in question, Section 6308-6, General Code, is as follows:

“The owner, operator or person responsible for the operation of a motor vehicle shall not be liable for loss or damage arising from…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. StitzleIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Cash v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Sproule v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Wagnon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API