Legal Opinion

Scott v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1954No. 4737PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

With an exception not pertinent here, section 203(a) (14) of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, 49 Stat. 543, 544, 49 U.S.C.A. § 303(a) (14), in presently material part defines the term “common carrier by motor vehicle” to mean any person which holds itself out to the general public to engage in the transportation by motor vehicle in interstate commerce of property for compensation. Section 203(a) (15), 49 U.S.C.A. § 303 (a) (15), in presently pertinent part defines the term “contract carrier by motor vehicle” to mean any person which, under individual contracts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. W. Stickle & Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. Taylor v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. McWood Corporation v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  4. Studna v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
  5. Lamb v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API