Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1953No. 13512_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Taylor appeals from a judgment on a complaint of the Interstate Commerce Commission, hereafter the Commission, holding he is a “contract carrier by motor vehicle” under 49 U.S.C.A. § 303 (15) of the Interstate Commerce Act, hereafter the Act, and, since he has no authorization therefor by the Commission, enjoins him from transporting in interstate commerce his lumber in his wholesale business of buying finished lumber in Oregon, transporting it and selling it f. o. b. to retail yards in Idaho.
The Commission contends a policy of Congress requires us to give a liberal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- A. W. Stickle & Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. PickardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McWood Corporation v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
- Shippers Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation, and Pierson-Corn, Inc., a Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.