Legal Opinion
Studna v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 23, 1964No. Civ. A. 13968-4PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECKER, District Judge.
In this action under Section 1336, Title 28 U.S.C.A. plaintiff, a wholesale automobile distributor, seeks to set aside certain orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) requiring the plaintiff to cease and desist from his so-called “Plan 2” operations, hereinafter described.
On March 19, 1959, the Commission (acting through its Division 1) instituted an investigation under Section 204 (c) 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to determine whether plaintiff, Morris Studna, doing business as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- A. L. Root Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1968
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1966
- Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. Anson D. MedlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Keller Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1970
- Pilgrim Co-operative Bank v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.