Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The Interstate .Commerce Commission, conceiving that Appellee was engaged in the transportation of property for hire either as a common, or contract, carrier, which had not complied with the applicable statutes, unsuccessfully sought an injunction in the Court below.
The evidence disclosed the following pertinent aspects of Appellee’s business operation :
It owns and operates twelve filling stations for the retail sale of gasoline, oil, and kerosene; it has furnished all of the pumps, tanks, and other equipment in four additional filling stations under contracts which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. W. Stickle & Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Woerter v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Southern Railway Co. v. Bateman Fruit ExchangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McWood Corporation v. State Corporation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Taylor v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.