Legal Opinion

CPF Vaseo Assocs., LLC v. Gray

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 6, 2018No. D072909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.

*1000Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 provides the trial court with a mechanism to sanction certain bad faith actions and tactics.1 Pursuant to a former version of that section, the trial court ordered CPF Vaseo Associates, LLC (CPF) and its counsel, John P. Byrne, to pay Bruce W. Gray and Barbara Gray (the Grays) just over $30,000 in fees and costs. Yet a mandatory procedural prerequisite to that award was never fulfilled. The motion requesting sanctions was served and filed on the same day, and no safe harbor period was afforded for CPF and Byrne to correct the challenged conduct. While a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Martorana v. Marlin & SaltzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Barnes v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ari Law v. Autonation.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  2. Del Biaggio v. BansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. J.N. v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Smith v. Hunt & Henriques CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Zarate v. McDanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API