Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hunt & Henriques CA4/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 2021No. D076278Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/2/21 Smith v. Hunt & Henriques CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RUSSELL SMITH, D076278 Plaintiff, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-0001062- CU-NP-CTL) HUNT & HENRIQUES, Defendant and Respondent; ABBAS…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Kurwa v. KislingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API