Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Department of Corrections

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1999No. F030743PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, P. J.

Introduction

Subdivision (c)(1) of Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7 1 provides that a motion for sanctions under this section “shall not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 30 days after service of the motion, or such other period as the court may prescribe, the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected.” This clause is commonly referred to as the “safe harbor provision” of the statute because it “allows the party against whom sanctions are sought an opportunity [‘safe harbor’] to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Vafi v. McCloskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Martorana v. Marlin & SaltzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. ClytusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Li v. Majestic Industrial Hills LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API