Legal Opinion

Del Biaggio v. Bansen

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 2026No. A174647Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 7/10/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR DANIEL DEL BIAGGIO, Plaintiff and Appellant, A174647 v. PETE BANSEN et al., (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. CV1901078) Defendants and Respondents. Daniel Del Biaggio was the prevailing party in a lawsuit he filed against Pete and Mary Ann Bansen. After trial, the court awarded him attorney fees pursuant to the parties’ contract, but reduced his attorney’s compensable hours and excluded, sua sponte, all claimed paralegal fees on the ground that the contract did not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API