Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Leonard v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. 95-1864PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43. State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. Snowden (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 141, 142, 647 N.E.2d 1374, 1377. Exceptions to disclosure are strictly construed against the custodian of the public records, and the burden to establish an exception is on the custodian. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 245, 247, 643 N.E.2d 126, 128.

Relator has received certain offense reports from respondents. However, respondents apparently do not possess any records suggesting that Lawrence Leonard was involved in any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Agee v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API