Legal Opinion

State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2002No. 2001-1797PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 327.] THE STATE EX REL. PIPOLY, APPELLANT, v. STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.,

2002-Ohio-2219.] Schools—Mandamus sought to compel State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio to award relator disability retirement benefits based on claim of multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome—Court of appeals’ denial of writ affirmed when relator fails to establish a clear legal right to disability retirement benefits or a corresponding clear legal duty on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Canavan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Agee v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning County Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Zidonis v. Columbus State Community CollegeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Gessner v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2009

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API