Legal Opinion

Abramovich v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1980No. 42PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether, in a Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board statutory proceeding, an individual who acted as legal counsel to the PLCB may also act as arbitrator. We conclude that the individual so acting may not arbitrate the dispute. Thus we reverse the Commonwealth Court order affirming the arbitration award.

Appellee Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board contracted with appellant Felix Abramovich for the distribution of liquor and supplies in the northwestern region of the Commonwealth. Shortly after the contract was executed, appellant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Amos Treat & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Sanko S.S. Co., Ltd., and Cook Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Dussia v. BargerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Giant Markets, Inc. v. Sigma Marketing Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Donegal Insurance v. LongoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 Ex Rel. Costello v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API