State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
Barisha Dill (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s December 19, 2012 order. That order affirmed an arbitration panel’s unanimous decision in favor of State Farm. Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). Appellant has waived both of the claims that she raises in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.
On March 14, 2003, Appellant, who was eleven years-old at the time, was being driven to school by George Foster (“Foster”). On the way to school, Foster’s vehicle was struck by a vehicle being operated by Melissa Marshall (“Marshall”). Appellant was injured in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Thompson v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Rosenbaum v. DruckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Abramovich v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Summers v. SummersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Murray, N. v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Wallace, R. v. State Farm Mutual AutomobileSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Shinal, M. v. Toms, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- State v. BoldenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Baudendistel, N. v. Macking, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.