Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, President Judge:
This is an appeal from the entry of judgment on a verdict of $9,815,525 for injuries suffered in an accident involving a bus owned by appellant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and driven by appellant Vance Zieganfuss. For convenience, we shall generally refer to both appellants as “SEPTA.” SEPTA argues: (1) that it is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was insufficient evidence of its negligence: (2) that it is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge should have recused himself; (3) that it is entitled to a…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Hathaway Ranch PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.