Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1984No. 1627PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of judgment on a verdict of $9,815,525 for injuries suffered in an accident involving a bus owned by appellant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and driven by appellant Vance Zieganfuss. For convenience, we shall generally refer to both appellants as “SEPTA.” SEPTA argues: (1) that it is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because there was insufficient evidence of its negligence: (2) that it is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge should have recused himself; (3) that it is entitled to a…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Hathaway Ranch PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
  5. Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API