Legal Opinion
Can Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 7, 1979No. 48349PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The constitutionality and validity of Minnesota’s Package Review Act (Minn.St. 116F.06) and the regulations for package review (Minn.Reg. SR-1 to SR-6) promulgated under the statute by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) are the subject of this appeal. Section 116F.06 was enacted on May 24, 1973 (L.1973, c. 748, § 6); the regulations became effective on December 31, 1974.
The complaint for declaratory judgment and the motion for injunctive relief were initiated in May 1975 by plaintiffs, five industry associations representing manufacturers of packages and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- City of Lake Elmo v. Minnesota Municipal BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019