Legal Opinion

Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1988No. C9-87-1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent John Doe, M.D., commenced an action under Minn.Stat. § 13.08 (1986), seeking temporary and permanent injunc-tive relief against the State Board of Medical Examiners. He contended that release of the board’s decision following a contested-case proceeding against him would violate the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act to the extent that it would make public information dealing with dismissed charges. After this court issued a writ of prohibition ordering a trial on the merits, the trial court granted a permanent injunction prohibiting the board from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. County of Ramsey v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. L.K. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Padilla v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Can Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API