Legal Opinion
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1995No. CX-93-2449PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) issued to Domtar, Inc. a Request For Response Action (“RFRA”) relating to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at an environmentally contaminated property located in Duluth, Minnesota. Domtar commenced against its alleged insurers the declaratory judgment action underlying this appeal. Domtar sought a judgment declaring that defendants are obliged to defend Domtar against the MPCA’s allegations and to reimburse Domtar for investigation costs it has incurred.
Canadian General Insurance Company, one…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Shoppers Food Warehouse v. MorenoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Tuttle v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Samir M. Shams v. Sona HassanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.