Legal Opinion
Perloff v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 2, 1945No. 8466PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, Circuit Judge.
This matter concerns a petition to review and set aside a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission which prohibits the petitioners from using any trade name containing the word “Packing” in connection with products not packed by them.
The petitioners are wholesale grocers, with their principal office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and three branches in Chester, Wilkes-Barre and Shenandoah, all in Pennsylvania. They sell only to retailers and not to consumers direct. They have been engaged in the wholesale business of canned foods in commerce since 1922.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Trade Commission v. Royal Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Herzfeld v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Progress Tailoring Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Globe Cardboard Novelty Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Galter v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Northern Feather Works, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Bernard H. Sumergrade, Harry O. Sumergrade and Saul R. Sumergrade, Co-Partners Trading as N. Sumergrade & Sons v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.