Legal Opinion
C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 27, 1952No. 10479_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, circuit judge.
Petitioner, a pen point manufacturer, seeks to set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission of March 29, 1951 which ordered it forthwith to cease and desist from:
“(1) Representing, through the use on fountain pen points of the term T4 Kt. Gold Plated’ or T4 K. Gold Plate,’ or any other term or mark, that such points are coated or covered with an alloy of substantial thickness and not less than 14/24ths by weight of gold, when such is not the fact; or misrepresenting in any manner the quantity or quality of the gold coating or covering on any fountain pen points.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Galter v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Indiana Quartered Oak Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Beneficial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Beneficial Management Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Bernard v. BausCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Abel Allan Goodman, an Individual Trading as Weavers Guild v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- The Regina Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Delaware v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Kidwell v. Master DistributorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.