Legal Opinion
Herzfeld v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 1, 1944No. 151PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before us on a petition to review that part of an order of the Federal Trade Commission which forbade petitioners to use the word, “Mills,” as part of their title, or otherwise to represent that they manufactured the rugs which they sold. The only questions are whether the evidence was sufficient to justify the Commission’s action, and whether the remedy provided was within its powers. The case was tried upon a stipulation of facts, which, so far as relevant to the appeal before us were as follows. The petitioners do business under the title “Stephen Rug…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Hospital Corporation of America v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Consumer Sales Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.