Federal Trade Commission v. Royal Milling Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
*
This writ brings here for consideration six orders made by the Federal Trade Commission under § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, c. 311, 38 Stat. 717, 719, Title 15, U. S. C., § 45, which declares that unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce are unlawful. Proceeding under the act 1 the commission filed separate com plaints against respondents, each of whom operates a business, either as a corporation, partnership or an individual, in the City of Nashville, Tennessee. All are engaged in preparing for the market self-rising flour and plain flour, and selling the same in.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Warshawsky & Co. v. A. Warshawsky & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.