Legal Opinion
Globe Cardboard Novelty Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 16, 1951No. 10424_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STALEY, Circuit Judge.
We are asked to review a cease and desist order entered by the Federal Trade Commission'against petitioners.
The Commission instituted this proceeding by a complaint issued on August 10, 1942. An answer was duly filed and hearings were subsequently held. On April 21, 1950, petitioners filed a substituted answer in which they admitted all the material allegations of fact set forth in the complaint and waived all intervening procedure and further hearing as to the facts. The Commission rendered findings of fact based on the allegations of the complaint. The salient facts so…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Hill v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Marco Sales Company, a Corporation, and Marvin O. Baer, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. MacLean Hunter Publishing Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.