Church v. Shanklin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denyiny a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of two promissory notes, for the sum of five thousand dollars each, payable by defendants to plaintiff “ whenever he perfects the title to lots 14, 15, and 16, in block 85, of Fresno, to the satisfaction of Church & Cory, attorneys. .... Neither principal nor interest to be due and payable until said title is perfected as aforesaid, nor until one year.”
The record fails to show that Church & Cory refused to express satisfaction with the plaintiff’s title through any fraudulent or improper motive. The learned judge of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Butler v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Baasen v. BaehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- McCarren v. McNultyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1856
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Hollingsworth v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Friendly v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.