Gladding, McBean & Co. v. Montgomery
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin J. Cole, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal taken in accordance with the method provided by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $825, for work and material performed and supplied by plaintiff in the construction of a tile roof for defendant.
The original contract was for the sum of $790, but this amount was increased by extra work by the amount of thirty-five dollars, making the total contract price $825, for which amount judgment was rendered.
The agreement was in writing, executed by defendant and by the plaintiff, under its seal and the signature of its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keeler v. CliffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Doll v. . NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bowery National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Bruner v. HegyiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rowe v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.